(The first part is taken from the internet and slightly modified. The second part is written by myself.)
Let's run a mindboggling defecit that guarantees failure for my children's children and use that money for the illusion of wealth creation. GDP will certainly has the potential to rise next year, probably beginning in Q3 but it's a fake rise. The idea that building things that cost enormous amounts of money that you don't have making things better is even crazier than having a guy run the economy who can't figure out his own tax liability. The Obama stimulus plan can be basically summed up as follows: "if I give my 21 month son a 'job' working in the family sandbox and he makes a massive sand castle are we better off? Additionally I pay him off of one of my credit cards." Technically his business is bringing in money and thus conributing to GDP, but the money isn't real. It has to be paid back eventually! This means that money cannot be used for wealth creation in the future and instead of going into new goods it's going into NONSENSE. The economic stimulus package works exactly the same way. Robbing Peter's grandchildren to pay Paul is no way to practice macroeconomics. What are they teaching at the previously esteemed Harvard (or any university) these days?
Additionally all this 'job creation' is total and utter crap. The government doesn't create wealth it spends it. THE GOVERNMENT IS A
This stimulus plan is stupid and will only bring long term harm to the economy. No matter how you look at it 'running a defecit' (wasting the taxpayers' money) with a national debt that basically equals GDP means: higher taxes, decreased business profitability and additional costs for future generations.
-
Instead let's start making the economy effective and start to spend money in ways that make sense and promote the economy to become more healthy. Actuallywe learn in middle school that spending now means that you can spend less in the future. Therefore what in fact would be good is to just stop spending for a change. People refer to spending tax money to grow the economy while we should actually stop spending tax money to grow the economy. 'Borrowing money costs money (try explaining that to Obama).'
Get rid of all these taxes and what is left is companies that have more money to hire people instead of paying that money in taxes to the government that in turn hires more useless bureaucrats. Additionally, people who work more or better will get the equivelant seen in their pay. Useless people will be just accepted for how they are (useless) and will not be pushing the economy down with their low productivity so productivity will go up and we will have an unprecedented era of prosperity. Plus, our children will not be paying for current and future 'sand castle building' costs in a stimulus which has never proven to be economically beneficial. See, the less we spend now the more we can spend in the future, plus we won't be building sand castles in the hope to stimulate the economy. Let's start treating the roots of the problem instead of the symptoms.
No comments:
Post a Comment